Electron cloud model facts represent the true appearance of atomic structures. However, the electron cloud model isn't the way that an atom's appearance has always been represented. Updates in the technology available for looking at the tiny structures has revealed that earlier theories about atomic behavior and atomic appearance were wrong. Only by learning the truth about electron cloud models can you really understand what's happening and what things look like at the atomic level.
Early images of the atom
Historically, atomic structures were presented in a model that looked like miniature solar system. The nucleus of the atom was at the middle, while protons, neutrons, and electrons orbited around it much like the planets orbit the sun. It was simple, easy to draw, and made intuitive sense to people with a limited scientific background. Unfortunately, it was also totally incorrect in its portrayal of atomic behavior and how atoms actually look under a microscope.
As microscopes and magnification technologies improved, scientists could see that there wasn't a fixed orbit for the elements of the atom. The nucleus was still more or less in the middle of things, but there weren't orbits. In fact, anything drawn using the rules of the planetary system just didn't represent atomic behavior correctly and perpetuated false ideas about how atoms looked.
Using quantum mechanics to re-draw atomic models
In observing atomic behavior under new and improved equipment, scientists gradually realized that they needed to use quantum mechanics to illustrate how the different particles of the atom were moving. Instead of fixed orbitals, they needed to represent electrons in a cloud surrounding the nucleus, since microscopic images had clouds instead of orbits. This cloud provided an approximate image of where electrons were in relation to the other parts of the atom while also showing that scientists couldn't accurately pinpoint the position of an electron at any fixed moment in time due to the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics.
Unlike the perceived certainty of the planetary model of an atom, the uncertainty principle required scientists to admit that their models of atomic behavior were more like educated guesses than true images. The idea that atomic behavior couldn't be perfectly predicted was pioneered by Erwin Schrodinger when he published his work on quantum mechanics in 1926, but it took some time to really go mainstream within the scientific community. Schrodinger's opponents kept hoping that improvements in magnification technologies would finally give them a better look at the orbits, but as science progressed it was harder and harder to deny that Schrodinger's principles represented a truer picture of what was really going on with electrons and other atomic particles.
As a result, modern scientific theory supports the electron cloud model facts over any image of an atom that looks like the solar system. While the nuances of quantum mechanics are much harder for students and the general public to understand than planetary theory, quantum mechanics is a more accurate way to represent how atoms look and how electrons behave.